Victoriya Varenikova has outlined important facets of pre-deal counterparty due diligence
Pre-deal due diligence of a counterparty is where you should not be stingy about either time or money. Your counterparty may conceal some detail because of failing to grasp its importance. Such mistakes can cost you money and sometimes even reputation.
Whether you have found your lucky business partner or just need to sign another contract in the course of your normal business operations, you should always ask yourself: “Should I sign this deal?”. The answer to this question is provided by the due diligence procedure intended to disclose comprehensive information about your counterparty, its assets, facilities, or tax risks.
In order to be able to make the correct decision, you need to keep in mind several important facets of due diligence, in particular:
- public and insider information about the counterparty;
- the signatory’s authority;
- the subject matter of the deal;
- willingness to compromise.
These and other elements of the due diligence procedure are outlined in detail in an article entitled “Legal Due Diligence: an important equation with many variables” written by Sofiya Law Firm’s Associate Partner Victoriya Varenikova for the magazine Chief Financial Officer.
NEWS OF LF “SOFIYA”
Determining the jurisdiction of the court: the lawyers have discussed the rules and problems
24.06.2020How to determine the jurisdiction of the court correctly, where to apply for protection of violated rights and legitimate interests, in particular, regarding real estate, land, return of deposits of natural person, the organization of public tenders and the conclusion of contracts based on their results?
How to fight agrarian raiding (advice of Sofiya Law Firm partner Mr Oleksandr Polivodskyy)
18.06.2020The desire to seize someone's property will probably always exist. Therefore, we can only talk about the minimization of agrarian raiding, including through the existing legal mechanisms in Ukrainian society and the implementation of the principle of inevitability of punishment.